Monday, February 11, 2013

The politics of protest

Renton de Alwis

‘Politics’ and ‘protest’ in my mind are two of the most thinly defined terms in usage our vocabulary. To most they are negatives and things that the ‘good’ among us do not take on. Yet, these two words given new meaning to explore its true potential can indeed be most meaningful and beneficial to human kind. This column written and published in February 2012, attempted to explore this proposition and I share it with you today to place it for your critical thought.


I had a friend who often spoke of politics and of protest. One could call him a ‘political activist’ for he ventured to publish a monthly journal on politics and dissent and from time to time helped groups of people and individuals who could not help themselves achieve ‘common good’ social objectives. Such were done by him through mobilising financial help from likeminded others for he did not have the means to carry them out himself.

With the oil price hikes and the resultant fall-out ‘protests’ taken on by political parties and other interest groups, I took on to examining what this phenomenon meant at its very basic level. Herein, I recall some of the anecdotes associated with my friend dating a decade or so ago.

Defining politics

One day, I asked him what he meant by ‘politics’ if it was not the usually defined “art or science of running governmental or state affairs or as it applies to institutions, fields, and special interest groups such as the corporate, academic, and religious segments of society or social relations involving authority or power”. 

My friend’s position was that all of this defining did not deal with the day to day realities of the need for justice and fair play or the protection of the powerless and the vulnerable within a society. For him and till this day for me, the term ‘politics’ brings a deeper and a more personal meaning, different to what I was made to believe through the Laskian tradition. It is more on empowerment of people in distress and in providing opportunities for the marginalized to be partners in the process of development, while protecting them from the forces of injustice, waste and corruption.

He explained that a task he undertook in helping a fatherless child regain the ownership of a property left for her by her late father was ‘politics’. A tenant who occupied that property had fraudulently attempted to gain its ownership through a crooked lady lawyer who had helped him design a false-deed for the property. The child and her mother did not have the means to seek resolve though the judicial process and the tenant and the lawyer both knew this. My friend, having learnt of this situation simply printed and pasted a few posters around the lawyer’s residence warning that this fraud would be exposed. There were no names mentioned or specific references made. It resulted in a happy ending to the episode with the tenant dropping his claim of the property at the insistence of the lawyer.

You there

On another occasion, he together with a few likeminded friends supported a group of villagers living close to a face of a granite rock used for quarry mining. Blasting of this rock for boulders, using dynamite was causing immense hardship to the villagers. He used his influence with the television media to expose this situation and saw to it that the license given earlier for the activity was reexamined and revoked by the relevant authorities. This was done with much hardship working against attempts of a few powerful people associated with party-based politics, who were bent on maintaining status-quo. 

On yet another occasion he told me of how he was able to mobilize a group of otherwise docile passengers to rise against a drunkard bully in a crowded bus, attempting to hurt an innocent passenger. In an instance and on a call of ‘Ado’ (loud call of ‘you there’) all the passengers who till then were passive observers watching the bullying had risen to assist to protect the innocent man. My friend equated his spontaneous call of ‘Ado’ as an instance of ‘politics of protest’ in action.

Common good

The dictionary definition of protest is “the expression or declaration of objection, disapproval, or dissent, often in opposition to something a person is powerless to prevent or avoid”. Within the framework of democratic governance, protest is a sacrosanct right of a citizen when it is done within the bounds of that allowed by the law of that land. It must also have a morally rightful stance in the declaration of the said objection i.e. only being motivated by the need and will to make things better for the common good, without allowing gains that are personal or of an interest group. In essence, it must not have any other petty agenda forming the basis for such protest.  

Satyagraha or "truth force" is defined in the Wikipedia as a particular philosophy and practice within the broader overall category generally known as nonviolent resistance or civil resistance. The term was conceived and developed by Mahatma Gandhi and was deployed in the Indian independence movement and as well as during his earlier struggles in South Africa. Satyagraha theory influenced Nelson Mandela's struggle in South Africa under apartheid and Martin Luther King, Jr.'s campaigns during the civil rights movement in the United States.

Most recently we saw similar movements take on issues of corruption in governance and in corporate affairs such as the Anna Hazare campaign in India for enacting the Jan Lokpal (People’s governance on anti-corruption) bill and the Occupy movement in the USA. Both used peaceful means of agitation drawn from the Gandhian tradition and gained much momentum.

Power of One

Interestingly the protagonists of both these campaigns have attributed its widespread success to the power of info-communications and the intense and widespread reach the social networks have in the current context of its development. With the Internet based social networks political issues gain momentum of proportions never before seen. The concept of ‘power of one’ in political protest is now a reality and need be recognized for its potency and productive mobilization.   

Protests are often masterminded or orchestrated by external forces that are only interested in gaining access to resources within countries through creation of disharmony and mayhem. These are often presented and justified laying them on platforms of ‘protecting human rights or democracy’ when the real intent is to destabilize nations and their economies. The ‘Arab Spring’ conflicts and last week’s, bloody protests in Afghanistan when Islam’s Holy Book was reportedly burnt in a most insensitive manner by a group of foreign solders stationed there, are demonstrative of the causes and effects of such schemes.

It is sad that we once again live in an era of human existence where waging war and cultivating separatism and dissent have become lucrative business propositions, just like it was during the phase of colonialism we were subjected to during the last few centuries.     

Positive protest

In the alternative, I wonder why our protests should not take a more positive note and become part of the routine of our daily life, like my late friend had demonstrated. Here are some examples of the possibilities therein, as he would have prescribed.

To refrain from ever giving or taking bribes or using undue influence to get things done (e.g. those tenders, jobs, entering your child to school, a patient to a hospital or sharing of insider information for making undue gains in the corporate world). Such often deprive the deserving from getting their due, even within systems where meritocracy once reigned. In each instance, when this is violated by another, we must be able to raise our voices, take action and protest vehemently through all peaceful means available to us.

Wherever and whenever a corrupt or an anti-social practise such as that of drug dealers, unethical medical practitioners, corrupt politicians, heads of schools and the like is observed raising your voice against it, regardless of how powerful those behind such practises may seemingly be, is another way to ensure that meaningful ‘protest’ is made .

When there is hardship felt during price hikes and shortages of goods, why not initiate and take on austere practices such as community ‘car pooling’ to save on fuel, make citizen’s calls on the political leaders to cut back on their show-offish and wasteful use of resources including fuel guzzler clusters of vehicles and security personnel. Sharing whatever one has in excess with others less fortunate, helping those in need with opportunities to regain their lives, providing educational support sharing your knowledge and skills without expecting pecuniary benefits for it will be another. Venturing to help the marginalised and the vulnerable living in the community around you in even in the smallest possible way are some great ways to register our ‘political protest’ against the wrong we see and agitate about.

We must not underestimate the ‘Power of One’ in ‘political protest’ and the phenomenon’s potency as a tool to even get those who haul party lines, other cronies and interest groups to change their selfish and self-seeking ways.

Google image from sve.se

No comments:

Post a Comment