Written and published in December 2011, the column examined how some seek to destroy what good is left among humanity with words written and said. In the current context both in the international and local scenes, a realisation of the damage such does to human minds need to be further explored and exposed. I repost this column today with the hope of stimulating such exploration in your mind’s eye.
For most of us, ‘to occupy’ would mean that we define
it in a spatial sense. To many, it is what each of us perceive as our own and
/or as defined by social convention that become our space i.e. title deeds, the
wata-kotu (fences), our spheres of knowledge, influence and the extent of power
we can wield.
‘Space’ to some would mean the outer-space as we know
it in terms of man’s attempt to conquer it. Space exploration missions to the
moon, mars etc would be examples.
Dominance over others
Most nations have an acquired sense of space that goes
far beyond their own territorial domains defined in the cartographic maps or by
the tenants of the law of the sea. Some such definitions have been or are being
made after much sacrifice of human and other forms of life in the many, many wars
that were or are fought to gain dominance over ‘space’, through exercising the
will to establish overt or covert power within such ill-acquired spaces. That
comes from being ‘powerful’ in the sense of the desire, need and the ability for
dominance of other ‘less powerful’ or even ‘vulnerable’ nations or peoples
infringing on their own defined territorial integrity. Some have been acquired
by harming Mother Nature causing her ill health as we witness in the form of
climate change and global warming now. In most cases these have been disguised
as being wars for or efforts at establishing justice, democracy, creation of
wealth, goodwill and peace, when in fact they are nothing more than attempts to
gain access to vital resources and/or to challenge belief systems not akin to
that of the dominant.
That brings to mind what George Orwell, in his
dystopian novel ‘1984’, published in 1949 told, referring to the state
of perpetual war in ‘Oceania’, his crafted society ruled by the oligarchic dictatorship of the
‘Party’ administrated by a privileged inner party elite; “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot
stumping on a human face for ever”. We heard and continue to hear much of this
sentiment emanating from the front-liners of the ‘Occupy Movement’, which actually
got me to wonder about the whole notion of ‘space’.
Shift of
power
The concept
of territorial integrity in essence is about space and the rest comes as
appendage. When we talk of economic and
social power shifts from the North to the South or the West to the East, we
indeed talk about space and what has been happening or not happening in that
space.
At another
level popular science writer and physicist Marcus Chown in his book The
Quantum Zoo: A Tourist's Guide to the Never-ending Universe published in
2005, using simple analogies and fun derivations thus refers to space and its
true nature “Space and time are both relative.
Lengths and time intervals become significantly warped at speeds approaching
the speed of light. One person's interval of space is not the same as another
person's interval of space. One person's interval of time is not the same as
another person's interval of time.”
Relativity
A
bit out of steam, as in the real world and in our day- to-day chores we would
not be anywhere close to defining space and time in relation to the speed of
light, I was relieved by his next quote from Einstein which placed it in a
better light "When a man sits with pretty girl for an hour, it seems like
a minute, But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute--it's longer than an
hour. That's relativity"
In
the Buddha word, space refers to emptiness or Shunayatha. ‘The concept of the
zero’ as Zen teaching has it, refers to a state where any space, physical or
made of the mind can be usefully and positively functional in a space-time
sense, the ultimate emptiness being that of Nirvana, a state devoid of time or
space.
Occupy
movements
You may wonder why I got into this discourse on the idea of space
and its occupation. It is because of what is happening in the world around us
and in particular the ‘Occupy Wall
Street ’ type movements that are gaining wide
spread ground on the real domain and on social media. It is on hearing the call
of the 99%.
In an article released late last week, Bruce E. Levine, an occupy movement activist, clinical psychologist and
author of “Get Up, Stand Up: Uniting Populists, Energizing the
Defeated, and Battling the Corporate Elite” unfolded a story on alternet.org
which should shock us all. Its title “How
Ayn Rand seduced generations of young men and helped make the U.S. into a selfish,
greedy nation.”
I must confess, I
had not known anything about Ayn Rand or what influence she has had on the
youth in the US
as claimed by the author till then, but was shocked to read what he had to say.
Negative
influence
He wrote “Only
rarely in U.S.
history did writers transform us to become a more caring or less caring nation.
In the 1850s, Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896) was a strong force in making
the United States
a more humane nation, one that would abolish slavery of African Americans. A
century later, Ayn Rand (1905-1982) helped make the United States into one of the most
uncaring nations in the industrialized world, a neo-Dickensian society where
healthcare is only for those who can afford it, and where young people are
coerced into huge student-loan debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
Self-interest
In Levin’s words when he was a kid, his
reading “included comic books and Rand ’s The
Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.” He added “There wasn’t
much difference between the comic books and Rand ’s
novels in terms of the simplicity of the heroes. What was different was that
unlike Superman or Batman, Rand made
selfishness heroic, and she made caring about others a weakness.”
Rand said, “Capitalism and altruism are
incompatible….The choice is clear-cut: either a new morality of rational
self-interest, with its consequences of freedom, justice, progress and man’s
happiness on earth—or the primordial morality of altruism, with its
consequences of slavery, brute force, stagnant terror and sacrificial
furnaces.” For many young people, hearing that it is “moral” to care only about
oneself became intoxicating, and some get addicted to this idea for life he
said.
Seeds
of justice
The celebrated American writer Gore Vidal who
was in Sri Lanka for the Galle Literary Festival in 2008 is quoted to say “Thanks
in part to Rand, the United States is one of the most uncaring nations in the
industrialized world. Ayn Rand’s ‘philosophy” is nearly perfect in its
immortality, which makes the size of her audience all the more ominous and
symptomatic as we enter a curious new phase in our society.… to justify and
extol human greed and egotism is to in my mind is not only immoral, but evil”
he added.
Spaces available for occupying are many. They
can also be defined in any which way to fit our own desires and needs. Yet,
there is what is right, just, moral and fair. Spaces that are filled with the
right thoughts and deeds will sow the seeds that will form an anti-thesis to
the picture Orwell painted in his 1984. The future Orwell saw is now and it is
time that there is a redefining of how spaces are used, by whom for what. They
certainly must not be occupied by the likes of Ayn Rand followers as described
by Levine.
No comments:
Post a Comment